Chris Pollett > Students > Hammoudeh
Print View
[Home]
[Blog]
[Initial Project Proposal]
[Thesis Deliverables]
[GitHub Repository]
[Solver Documentation]
|
CS299 Proposal
An Enhanced Square-Piece, Multiple Simultaneous Jigsaw Puzzle Solver with Missing Pieces
Zayd Hammoudeh (zayd.hammoudeh@sjsu.edu)
Advisor: Dr. Chris Pollett
Committee Members: Dr. Thomas Austin, Dr. Teng Moh
Abstract:
Solving a jigsaw puzzle entails arranging a fixed set of pieces such that they reconstruct an original source image.
With a traditional jigsaw puzzle, finding the solution is straightforward as interpiece mechanical
incongruence and knowledge of the solution image reduce the number of possible piece permutations.
This project proposes an algorithm that can simultaneously reconstruct multiple jigsaw puzzles consisting of uniform, square pieces.
Unlike previous work, the algorithm takes no outside information (e.g., number of input puzzles). In contrast, the algorithm uses
the image information from the bag of individual, input pieces.
CS297 Results
- A literature review of existing techniques to solve jigsaw puzzles.
- A puzzle generator implemented using OpenCV that takes an image file as the input
- An enhanced implementation of a greedy solver based off the approach proposed by Paikin & Tal (see the references for the specific
paper).
- Visualization tools for solutions to puzzle solver solutions as well as best buddy relationships.
Proposed Schedule
Week 1:
August 23-30 | Complete documentation for CS299 plan for approval by the CS department. |
Week 2:
August 31 - September 6 | Begin implementation of the segmentation algorithm used by
Pomeranz et. al.. Present preliminary results and provide a short description of the technique. |
Week 3:
September 7 - 13 | Continue implementation of the segmentation algorithm used by
Pomeranz et. al.. |
Week 4:
September 14 - 20 | Finalize initial implementation of the segmentation algorithm used by
Pomeranz et. al.. Begin extension of the algorithm to support missing pieces. |
Week 5:
September 21 - 27 | Deliverable #1: Complete missing piece implementation of the Pomeranz et. al.
segmentation algorithm. |
Week 6:
September 28 - October 4 | Begin development of an algorithm that predicts the number
of input puzzles. Provide a preliminary strategy for review. |
Week 7:
October 5 - 11 | Continue implementation of the input puzzle prediction algorithm. Provide initial accuracy
results for review. |
Week 8:
October 12 - 18 | Deliverable #2: Input puzzle algorithm completed. Provide
final results. |
Week 9:
October 19 - 25 | Begin development of the multipass solver that utilizes both the input puzzle count analyzer
and segmentation algorithm completed in previous deliverables. Provide a basic
flow chart showing the implementation plan of the algorithm. |
Week 10:
October 26 - November 1 | Continue development of the implementation of the multipass algorithm and potentially
provide first pass results. |
Week 11:
November 2 - 8 | Continue development of the first pass algorithm and show a concrete flow chart of the algorithm and
initial results for review. |
Week 12:
November 9 - 15 | Deliverable #3: Multipass solver using segmentation based error detection
complete. |
Week 13:
November 16 - 22 | Perform experiments and data collection with final algorithm for inclusion
in the thesis report and presentation. |
Week 14:
November 23 - 29 | Finalize any remaining work. Begin writing of thesis report and creation of
the slides for the defense. |
Week 15:
November 30 - December 6 | Continue working on thesis report and defense slides. |
Week 16:
December 7 - 13 | Deliverable #4: Thesis completed. Distribute to committee and provide
to graduate studies office. |
January 31, 2017 | Thesis Defense. |
Key Deliverables:
- Software
- Implementation of a segmentation algorithm to determine with a high degree of confidence
portions of the solution that are assembled correctly.
- Improvements to segmentation techniques to support the potential for missing pieces.
- An algorithm for estimating the number of input puzzles to the solver.
- A set of metrics used to measure the quality of solutions when solving
multiple jigsaw puzzles simultaneously.
- Report
- Complete a thesis write-up.
- Complete source code and thesis defense presentation.
Innovations and Challenges
- In traditional jigsaw puzzles, pieces usually have unique or significantly different shapes. This significantly simplifies
jigsaw puzzle solving since shape alone can be used to definitively determine that some pieces are not adjacent.
In constrast, the puzzle pieces in this are equal sized squares which eliminates the use of shape in determining
piece adjacency.
- Most previous work on the jigsaw puzzle problem focused on solving only a single puzzle at a time. Solving multiple (in particular)
large puzzles increases the number of piece permutations and introduces the complexity of dividing the input set of pieces
into disjoint subsets.
- Puzzles with missing pieces are more difficult since one cannot assume all internal pieces have a neighbor. What is more, missing puzzle
pieces increase the likelihood that two puzzle pieces will have an artificially high pairwise similarity. Both of these increase the difficulty
in solving a puzzle.
- Develop the first solver that takes no outside input other than the bag of puzzle pieces.
References:
- A. C. Gallagher, Jigsaw puzzles with pieces of unknown orientation, in
Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), CVPR 12, pp. 382389, IEEE Computer Society,
2012.
- D. Pomeranz, M. Shemesh, and O. Ben-Shahar, A fully automated greedy square
jigsaw puzzle solver, in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), CVPR 11, pp. 916, IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
- D. Sholomon, O. David, and N. S. Netanyahu, A genetic algorithm-based
solver for very large jigsaw puzzles, in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE
Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), CVPR
13, pp. 17671774, IEEE Computer Society, 2013.
- G. Bradski, The OpenCV library, Dr. Dobbs Journal of Software Tools,
Nov. 2000.
- G. Paikin and A. Tal, Solving multiple square jigsaw puzzles with missing
pieces, in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), CVPR 15, IEEE Computer Society, 2015.
|